Etymology/Derivation of Scientific Name
Etheostoma, from the Greek etheo, “to strain,” and stoma, mouth” (Pflieger 1997); artesiae reference to type locality. Species originally captured in an artesian well, hence its name (Hubbs et al. 1991). Piller et al. (2001) suggested use of the vernacular name “redspot darter” in reference to the brilliant red lateral spots of nuptial males.
Synonymy
Poecilichthys artesiae Hay 1881.
Etheostoma (Etheostoma) whipplei alabamae Gilbert and Swain in Gilbert, 1887
Type Locality
Holotype of Poecilichthys artesiae (Hay 1881): USNM 27434, collected from a small branch of Catawba Creek (Catalpa Creek), at Artesia, Lowndes County, Mississippi (Platania 1980).
Not listed as threatened or endangered by Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (2006). Populations in southern United States are currently stable (Warren et al. 2000).
Growth and population structure: Sex ratios are essentially 1:1; males larger than females, as is characteristic of riffle-inhabiting darters (Heins and Machado 1993).
Life colors: Distinct red (in males) or yellow spots (in females) on side of body; vertical blotches on sides of body usually not prominent (Hubbs et al. 1991). Body coloration variable. Dorsum and side of body whitish to brown; 8 to 10 saddles, sometimes expanded ventrally to form vertical bars, especially posteriorly; dark humeral spot, dusky to dark suborbital bar, and 3 basicaudal spots. Adult males with numerous discrete red spots on the side. In high males, red spots coalesce to appear as if sides were painted with bright red enamel. Spinous and soft dorsal, caudal, and anal fins with blue or blue green margin and narrow white band separating it from red band; pelvic fins dusky blue; pectoral fins clear. Females less colorful; side with yellowish spots; spinous dorsal fin with thin red orange submarginal band; soft dorsal and caudal fins with brown bands; other fins clear (Boschung and Mayden 2004).
Counts: 2 anal fin spines (Hubbs et al. 1991).
Body shape: Moderately robust and somewhat compressed (Boschung and Mayden 2004). Body cross section oval; body depth contained in standard length less than five times. Head profile rounded, profile in front of eye less than 45 degrees; snout less conical, not extending beyond upper lip (Hubbs et al. 1991).
Mouth position: Subterminal (Boschung and Mayden 2004).
External morphology: Gill membranes rather widely joined across isthmus, as black spot at upper margin of pectoral fins; lateral line straight; pectoral fin shorter than head, not reaching anus; scales on belly normal; preopercle smooth or weakly serrate (Hubbs et al.1991). Breeding tubercles on scales of belly, along anal fin base, and ventral part of caudal peduncle (Boschung and Mayden 2004).
Maximum size: 80 mm SL (Boschung and Mayden 2004).
Host Records
Mussel/host relationships: Elliptio arca with Etheostoma artesiae (Haag and Warren 2002)
U.S. distribution: Found in streams in the southeastern U.S. (Hubbs et al. 1991).
Texas distribution: Occurs in small creeks from the San Jacinto through the Sabine Basins (Hubbs et al.1991). Warren et al. (2000) listed the redspot darter as occurring in the following drainage units: Red River unit (from the mouth upstream to and including the Kiamichi River), Sabine Lake unit (including minor coastal drainages west to Galveston Bay).
Macrohabitat: Headwaters, creeks and small rivers (Retzer et al. 1986); where especially common, may occur in moderate-sized rivers (Moore and Rigney 1952).
Mesohabitat: Found over substrates of hard mud silt, sand, gravel, or cobble in slow moderate or rather fast current and sometimes amid vegetation and detritus. Largest populations found in small, clear rocky streams (Retzer et al. 1986; Moore and Rigney 1952).
Spawning season: Late February to mid-May in western Alabama; males reaching spawning condition earlier in the season than females, usually by January or early February (Heins and Machado 1993). Based on anecdotal information, species is known to spawn in early spring; peaks in mid-March to mid-April in Oklahoma, and April in Kansas (Cross 1967; Miller and Robinson 1973; Carlander 1997).
Fecundity: Clutch size of females (n=58) 31.2-53.9 mm SL were 31-207 eggs. Females (n=9) produced ripe, ovulated eggs ranging in size from 1.17-1.27 mm in mean diameter and 241-324 µg in mean weight (Heins and Machado 1993).
Subgenus Oligocephalus (Page 1981; Boschung and Mayden 2004). This darter most closely related to E. whippeli and E. radiosum (Retzer et al. 1986); these two species were long considered subspecifically distinct. In contrast to E. artesiae, E. radiosum lives in higher gradient streams and usually is found in very fast, gravel and rubble riffles (Retzer et al. 1986). Piller et al. (2001) demonstrated that they should be considered different species; Etheostoma artesiae can be distinguished from E. whipplei by lower counts of lateral line scales (<63) and caudal peduncle scales (<27). Etheostoma artesiae can be distinguished from E. radiosum by the presence of red lateral spots in breeding males. E. artesiae and E. parvipinne juveniles may be confused, but the former differs in having uninterrupted (versus interrupted) infraorbital and supratemporal canals, brachiostegal membranes slightly (versus broadly) connected, and spinous dorsal and caudal fin color bands (versus no color bands; Boschung and Mayden 2004).
Freshwater Fish Species of Texas: Etheostoma; Etheostoma artesiae; Percidae; Redspot Darter
Etymology/Derivation of Scientific Name
Etheostoma, from the Greek etheo, “to strain,” and stoma, “mouth;” chlorosoma, Greek, meaning “greenish-yellow” (Pflieger 1997).
Synonymy
Vaillantia chlorosoma Hay 1881:495.
Vaillantia camura Hay 1883:62.
Beleosoma camurum Hildebrand and Towers 1928:125.
Etheosoma chlorosomum Cook 1959:201.
Type Locality
Branch of Tuscumbia River, at Corinth, Alcorn County, Mississippi; Sand Creek, near Artesia, Lowndes County, Mississippi; and Horsehunter Creek, at Macon, Noxubee County, Mississippi (Hay 1881).
Currently secure (Warren et al. 2000).
Coloration: Head with preorbital bars that extend (and connect) around snout in addition to dark suborbital bars and postorbital spots; lateral region greenish-yellow with dark "X" and "M" shaped markings and a small dark caudal spot; ventral region white. Dorsal and caudal fins with light brown stripes; other fins are colorless. Breeding males have the above colors in a darker shade with operculum having a metallic green coloration and the first dorsal fin with black stripes notable anteriorly.
Counts: Data for specimens collected in the Colorado, Brazos, San Jacinto, Trinity, Neches, and Sabine drainages: 52-63 total lateral line scales, 10-40 are pored; 11-15 scales in transverse series; 16-23 caudal peduncle scale rows. Fin rays: dorsal 8-12; anal 7-10; branched caudal 12-15; total pectoral 24-28; pelvic 5 (Bart and Cashner 1986). 1 anal fin spine (Hubbs et al. 1991).
Body shape: Elongated and slender.
Mouth position: Subterminal and horizontal.
External morphology: Incomplete lateral line, blunt snout. Bart and Cashner (1986) noted sexual dimorphism in the following characters: Breeding males with small, tubular shaped genital papillae and thickened, fleshy pelvic and anal spines; tubercles observed on pelvic and anal spines; tubercles usually present on the anterior rays of these fins, but sometimes seen on all rays and spines. Females with large, fleshy heart-shaped genital papillae which increased in size as females approached height of breeding condition. Mature males and females have two rows of tubercle-like structures on the interradial membrane of the caudal fin (distribution and fleshy nature of structures suggests function similar to contact organs during spawning (Bartand Cashner 1986).
Maximum size: 50 mm SL (Etnier and Starnes 1993; Carlander 1997).
Host Records
Urocleidus chlorosomus and U. lottensis (Trematoda: Monogenea), reported from species in southern Mississippi (Harrises and Vickery 1970).
U.S. distribution: Mississippi River drainage and gulf slope drainages from Alabama to Texas
(Hubbs et al. 1991).
Texas distribution: Guadalupe River drainage eastward (Hubbs et al. 1991). Warren et al. (2000) listed the following drainage units for distribution of Etheostoma chlorosomum in the state: Red River (from the mouth upstream to and including the Kiamichi River), Sabine Lake (including minor coastal drainages west to Galveston Bay), Galveston Bay (including minor coastal drainages west to mouth of Brazos River), Brazos River, Colorado River, San Antonio Bay (including minor coastal drainages west of mouth of Colorado River to mouth of Nueces River).
Macrohabitat: Low gradient, clear, small streams to moderate-sized rivers (Gilbert 1980; Simon and Wallus 2006). Specimens collected from middle Brazos River (Texas) oxbow lakes (Winemiller et al. 2000; Zeug et al. 2005).
Mesohabitat: Backwaters, pools, and areas of slow current in areas with organic debris, silt, and sand (Gilbert 1980; Bart and Cashner 1986; Simon and Wallus 2006). Abundance of this species apparently unaffected by removal of submersed aquatic vegetation in Lake Conroe, a reservoir in the headwaters of the San Jacinto River, southeastern Texas, as it was rare when vegetation was abundant, and did not increase in abundance following vegetation removal (Bettoli et al. 1993).
Longevity: Up to three years (Etnier and Starnes 1993).
Food habits: Benthic invertivore (Goldstein and Simon 1999). In Tennessee specimens, stomachs contained hydropsychid caddisfly, dytiscid beetle, and midge larvae (Etnier and Starnes 1993; Goldstein and Simon 1999).
Spawning season: Early January to late March, in east Texas (Hubbs 1985). Spawning temperatures range from 22-26°C (Simon 1994).
Spawning location: Nest spawners on plants or plant debris (Winn 1958; Carlander 1997). Female selects spawning site; eggs laid on algae, twigs, and leaves (Page et al. 1982).
Reproductive strategy: Guarders; substratum spawners; phytophils – have adhesive eggs that are attached to a variety of plants. Free embryos without cement glands (Page et al. 1982; Bart, unpublished data in: Simon 1999). Male swims near female, both vibrate while depositing milt and one to three eggs per bout (Page et al. 1982).
Fecundity: Females measuring 38-49 mm TL collected from a creek in Union Parish, Louisiana, had a mean ovary weight that was 17.1% of the body weight, containing a mean of 117.6 total ova that average 0.83 mm in diameter; females showed statistically significant increasing fecundity with increasing length; females 38-49 mm TL had 73-171 large mature ova (Simon, T.P., unpublished data; Simon and Wallus 2006). Eggs from Louisiana are spherical, range from 0.9-1.1 mm diameter (mean 1.0 mm), translucent, demersal, and nonadhesive (Simon 1994). Eggs from Cummins Creek and various Neches River tributaries, Texas, average 1.05 mm in diameter; hatching occurs after 156-211 hours at an incubation temperature of 26°C (Hubbs 1967).
Age/size at maturation: No information; likely before age-1. Simon and Wallus (2006) reported that female specimens from an unnamed creek in Union Parish, Louisiana were sexually mature at 39 mm TL.
Commercial or Environmental Importance
[Additional literature noting collection of this species from Texas locations includes, but is not limited to the following: Hubbs and Hettler (1958); Evans and Noble (1979); Kleinsasser and Linam (1987); Linam and Kleinsasser (1987); Winemiller (1991); Matthews et al. (1996); Moriarty and Winemiller (1997); Winemiller et al. (2004).]
Freshwater Fish Species of Texas: Bluntnose Darter; Etheostoma; Etheostoma chlorosoma; Percidae
Etymology/Derivation of Scientific Name
Etheostoma, from the Greek etheo, “to strain,” and stoma, mouth”
(Pflieger 1997); fonticola: means fountain dweller. Before being inundated by a small dam and lake, the main spring at San Marcos was described as emerging like a fountain from a limestone basin (Keuhne and Barbour 1983).
Synonymy
Alvarius fonticola Jordan and Gilbert 1886.
Type Locality
San Marcos River, just below mouth of Blanco River, Texas (Jordan and Gilbert 1886).
Populations in southern drainages are considered endangered (Warren et al. 2000). Deacon et al. (1979) listed the species as endangered due to vulnerability of entire population to a single catastrophe. San Marcos River population estimated to number 102,966 individuals (Schenck and Whiteside 1976). Upper Comal River population estimated to number 168,078 individuals (Linam et al. 1993).
Etheostoma fonticola is threatened by reduction of spring flow, resulting from drought and water withdrawals from the Edwards Aquifer (Bonner and McDonald 2005), and exotic species; in an effort to identify general conservation measures for water quality, and habitat maintenance, a recovery plan for San Marcos and Comal springs and associated ecosystem was revised in 1996 (U.S. Fish and Wildlife 1996; Bonner and McDonald 2005). During periods of low flows, the National Fish Hatchery and Technology Center in San Marcos, Texas, serves as a refugium (Brandt et al. 1993; Bonner and McDonald 2005). Restriction on channel modification, streamside development, pollution, and excessive water usage has been recommended for the well-being of the species (Keuhne and Barbour 1983).
[Additional literature noting collection of this species from Texas locations includes, but is not limited to the following: Strawn and Hubbs (1956).]
Growth and population structure: Fish held at approximately 24 degrees C for 146 days grew an average of 0.2 mm/day (Brandt et al. 1993). Males outnumber females 1.4:1 (Schenck and Whiteside 1977b).
Coloration: Sides with large black rectangular blotches (Hubbs et al. 1991). Body is olive dorsally, white vetrally, with scattered dark spots dorsally and laterally and sometimes with 7-8 dusky dorsal saddles; midlateral row of greatly elongated dark blotches and often 3 small dark basicaudal spots; dark orbital bars present (Page 1983); pronounced black, clear, red, clear, and black bands on the 1st dorsal fin of males (Schenck and Whiteside 1977b), while that of the female is mostly clear; 2nd dorsal and caudal fins have light brown banding, while other fins are clear or with melanophores along the rays. Fins of breeding male much darker than those of female, especially 1st dorsal, pelvics, and anal, and black and red bands in the 1st dorsal fin intensify (Page 1983).
Counts: 6 dorsal fin spines (occasionally 7); 1 anal fin spine; less than 77 scales in lateral line; fewer than 6 lateral line scales with pores (Hubbs et al. 1991). Page (1983) listed counts for Etheostoma fonticola including: lateral scales 31-37 (32-34), 0-6 (2-3) pored; scales above lateral line 3-5; scales below lateral line 5-7; transverse scales 9-12 (11); scales around caudal peduncle 14-17 (16); dorsal spines 6-8 (7); dorsal rays 10-13 (10-11); pectoral rays 8-11 (9-10); anal rays 5-8 (6-7); 6 branchiostegal rays; vertebrae 32-33.
Body shape: Body depth contained in standard length less than seven times (Hubbs et al. 1991). Keuhne and Barbour (1983) described this darter as minute, but robust.
External morphology: Lateral line short; scales on belly normal (a narrow naked band may be present on midline); preopercle smooth or weakly serrate; upper jaw not extending as far as to below middle of eye (Hubbs et al. 1991). Breeding tubercles develop on anal and pelvic rays of male. Pelvic fins of male have expansive lateral flaps. Bilobed genital papilla of female is swollen and much larger than small flap-like papilla of the male (Page 1983).
Maximum size: Reaching 35.5 mm SL, it is the smallest of all darters (Page and Burr 1979).
Host Records
Exotic trematode, Centrocestus formosanus (Mitchell et al. 2000; Cantu 2003; McDonald et al. 2006; McDonald et al. 2007).
Texas distribution: Endemic to thermally constant (21-24 degrees C; Bonner and McDonald 2005) springs and the upper San Marcos (Hays Co.) and Comal (Comal Co.) rivers in central Texas; original population in the Comal River was extirpated in the mid-1950’s when Comal Springs ceased to flow (Hubbs et al 1991); a population from San Marcos was reintroduced into Comal Springs in 1975 (Schenck and Whiteside 1976). San Antonio Bay drainage unit (Warren et al. 2000).
Food habits: In the San Marcos River and Spring Lake, Texas, diet consists of immature insects and microcrustaceans; the majority of all fish collected during the spring contained dipteran larvae; during the summer, the majority of fish in the San Marcos River contained dipteran larvae, whereas the majority of those in Spring Lake contained copepods and ephemeropteran larvae; in the fall and winter, a majority of fish in the San Marcos River contained ephemeropteran larvae; majority of Spring Lake specimens contained amphipods during the fall, and copepod during winter; species is selective in how and what food items are consumed, with diet varying with relation to the season of year and the size of fish; feeding primarily during the daylight hours (Schenck and Whiteside 1977a). Main food items include cladocerans, copepods, amphipods, and aquatic insects (Bergin et al. 1997).
Macrohabitat: Thermally constant (21-24 degrees C; Bonner and McDonald 2005) springs and the upper San Marcos (Hays Co.) and Comal (Comal Co.) rivers in central Texas (Hubbs et al. 1991).
Mesohabitat: Critical thermal temperature for adult fish 34.8 degrees C (Brandt et al. 1993). Usually occurs in dense beds of Vallisneria, Elodia, Ludwigia and other aquatic plants that flourish in the San Marcos and Comal Springs; substrate normally mucky and fish exist among the plants (Schenck and Whiteside 1976; Burr 1980; Keuhne and Barbour 1983).
Spawning season: Year round, apparently with two spawning peaks, in August and late winter (Schenck and Whiteside 1977b). According to Strawn (1955; 1956), species will spawn readily at temperatures in the low 70’s and high 60’s; spawns year round in San Marcos Springs, Texas, in water ranging 3 – 5 degrees above and below 72 degrees C. Hubbs (1985) documented fertilized eggs 10 months out of the year (none in August and September).
Spawning location: Female lays adhesive eggs on filamentous algae and plants (Strawn 1956).
Reproductive strategy: Provides no parental care of eggs (Strawn 1956).
Fecundity: Bonner et al. (1998) reported mean egg production (± 1 SD) is 760 (±310) per two breeding pairs during a 33-day period at 23 degrees C, under laboratory conditions; optimal temperatures for egg production range from 14-27 degrees C, and 14-25 degrees C for larval production. Schenck and Whiteside (1977b) reported collection of mature ova (mean diameter 1.1 mm) in females 24 mm TL and longer in each month of the year; mean number of mature ova found in 74 females was 19. In aquaria, diameters of eggs ranged from 1.2-1.4; mature, water hardened eggs were heart shaped, slightly indented, vertically compressed, demersal, and adhesive; eggs contained a translucent, pale yellow yolk, a single oil globule (averaging 0.36 mm maximum diameter), smooth chorion, wide perivitelline space, and were unpigmented; eggs incubated at 20 degrees C began hatching on day 4 after fertilization and continued through day 7 (Simon et al. 1995).
Age at maturation: During laboratory spawning, eggs were collected from fish about 6 months old; in the San Marcos River, mature ova collected from individuals about 3.5 months old (Linam et al. 1993). Females longer than 24 mm TL are considered mature (Schenck and Whiteside 1977b).
Growth and population structure: Fish held at approximately 24 degrees C for 146 days grew an average of 0.2 mm/day (Brandt et al. 1993). Males outnumber females 1.4:1 (Schenck and Whiteside 1977b).
Phylogeny and morphologically similar fishes: The cypress darter (Etheostoma proeliare) is the closest ally, and one of the closest relatives of E. fonticola (Burr 1978). E. fonticola and E. proliare are similar, but differ in that the former species has a short lateral line with 0-6 pores, 1 anal spine, and cross-hatching on upper and lower side, while the latter species has a short lateral line with 0-9 pores, 2 anal spines, black or brown dashes along side, and spots on upper and lower side (Page and Burr 1991). Based on information from Simon and Kaskey (1992) regarding eggs, larvae, and early juveniles of selected Texas percids, E. fonticola could only be confused with members of subgenus Oligocephalus (Simon et al. 1995); E. fonticola hatches at the smallest total length, has fewer numbers of preanal myomeres than any other Texas percid, and yolk absorption occurs earlier than in members of Oligocephalus (Simon et al. 1995).
Freshwater Fish Species of Texas: Etheostoma; Etheostoma fonticola; Fountain Darter; Percidae
Etheostoma, from the Greek etheo, “to strain,” and stoma, mouth” (Pflieger 1997); spectabile: conspicuous and is appropriate for breeding males (Kuehne and Barbour 1983).
Synonymy
Poecilichthys spectabilis Agassiz 1854.
Poecilichthys versicolor Agassiz 1854.
Oligocephalus pulchellus Girard 1859.
Etheostoma arcuscelestic Crevecoeur 1903.
Etheostoma spectabile uniporum Distler 1968.
Etheostoma spectabile fragi Distler 1968.
Etheostoma spectabile squamosum Distler 1968.
Type Locality
Osage River, Missouri (Agassiz 1854)
Populations in the southern United States are currently stable (Warren et al. 2000).
In a Kentucky population, young reported to grow to about 45 mm TL the first year, with lengths of 60-70 mm attained the second year (Small 1975).
Coloration: Hubbs et al. (1991) list the following characteristics for this species in Texas: 8-9 body bars; throat of males orange (lost in preservation); no black spot on upper margin of pectoral fins; no pale longitudinal streak along lateral line; sides without large black rectangular blotches. Page (1983) lists coloration for Etheostoma spectabile throughout range: olive to brown dorsally, with 6 -11 dark green dorsal saddles. Dark blue vertical bars on side of body, variable in shape geographically, separated by yellow, orange, or red pigments (much brighter in males). Over much of the range of the species the anterior side has short horizontal rows of dark dots. Venter is white to orange. Branchiostegal membranes and often breast of adult male are bright orange. Orbital bars are black and prominent. In the male, 1st dorsal fin red basally and blue marginally and often (varies geographically) has clear and intermediate bands. The 2nd dorsal fin is mostly orange and often (varies geographically) blue basally. Anal fin is blue, green, or clear. Pelvic fins are blue; caudal and pectoral fins clear or yellow. Fins of female are mostly clear or have light brown bands.
Counts: 2 anal fin spines; more than 6 pored lateral line scales (Hubbs et al. 1991). Page (1983) lists the following counts for this species: lateral scales 32-61 (40-53), 10-42 (20-34) pored; scales above lateral line 5-6; scales below lateral line 7-9 (8); transverse scales 12-16 (14); scales around caudal peduncle 17-20 (18-19); dorsal spines 8-12 (9-10); dorsal rays 10-15 (12-13); pectoral rays 10-14 (11-12); anal rays 4-8 (6-7).
Body shape: Body cross section oval; body depth contained in standard length less than five times; head profile rounded, profile in front of eye less than 45 degrees; upper jaw not extending as far as to below middle of eye (Hubbs et al. 1991).
Mouth position: Terminal (Goldstein and Simon 1999).
External morphology: Infraorbital canal interrupted below eye; gill membranes barely connected; lateral line straight; pectoral fin shorter than head, not reaching anus; belly scaled (a narrow naked band may be present on midline); preopercle smooth or weakly serrate (Hubbs et al. 1991). Tubercles develop on breeding male on the anal, pelvic, and lower portion of the caudal and pectoral fins, and on ventral scales. During the breeding season females develop a long and tubular genital papilla (Page 1983).
Maximum size: 60 mm SL (Page 1983).
Host Records: Acanthocephalus tahlequahensis (Acanthocephala: Ecinorhynchidae; Oetinger and Buckner 1976).
U.S. distribution: Found through much of the central United States, especially in the Ozarks and Central Lowlands (Hubbs et al. 1991).
Texas distribution: Occurs primarily in the Edwards Plateau region from the San Antonio River north and east to the Red River. Absent from parts of streams flowing through the Coastal Plain (Hubbs et al. 1991). Warren et al. (2000) list the following drainage unit for distribution of Etheostoma spectabile in the state: Red River (from the mouth upstream to and including the Kiamichi River).
Food habits: Goldstein and Simon (1999) list first and second level trophic classifications for this species as invertivore, and benthic, respectively; main food items include midge and blackfly larvae, mayfly nymphs (Baetis, Stenonema), isopods, amphipods, and caddisfly larvae. After hatching, fry drift downstream into quiet, shallow pools and feed on small insects and crustaceans. Subadults and adults feed on larger foods including larval dipterans, caddisflies, amphipods, terrestrial insects, and fish eggs (Cross 1967; Edwards 1997).
Macrohabitat: Small to moderate-sized upland streams (Page 1983; Etnier and Starnes 1993).
Mesohabitat: Found in shallow gravel riffles, less often in raceways and pools (Page 1983); frequenting moderate to sluggish flowing water; often occurs with detritus or near undercut or brushy banks (Etnier and Starnes 1993). Inhabits hardwater, gravelly streams of Edwards, Ozark, and Interior Low plateaus and adjacent Central Lowlands of North America (Distler 1968). In streams, males occupy riffles throughout year; during the reproductive period, females remain downstream in pool habitat until ready to reproduce; migrations between the pools and riffles occur during winter months, with specimens remaining on the riffles often burying themselves into gravel to conserve energy (Simon 2006). Species often associated with vegetation, brush, rocks that provide protection (Kuehne and Barbour 1983; Page 1983). In some areas, species shows a preference for spring habitats, apparently being physiologically adaptable to stable thermal conditions (Hill and Matthews 1980). Pflieger (1966) reported newly-hatched larvae moving to occupy the nests of smallmouth bass, where they are apparently afforded some protection against small predators, and are able to find an abundance of microcrustacean food items.
Longevity: Most die after their first breeding season as adults; rarely live longer than 2 years (Edwards 1997).
Spawning season: Spawning in Texas occurs from mid-October through July (Hubbs and Armstrong 1962; Marsh 1980; Hubbs 1985).
Spawning habitat: Lithophils; rock and gravel spawners that do not guard their eggs. Large eggs are buried in gravel depressions called redds or in rock interstitial spaces (Simon 1999). Spawning occurs within and below shallow gravel riffles with moderate flows and the eggs are buried in the substrate (Edwards 1997).
Reproductive strategy: Nonguarders; brood hiders (Simon 1999). Prior to spawning, males establish territories around females and become relatively aggressive at this time (Edwards 1997). A male establishes territory around female, mounts the female, the pair vibrate as eggs and sperm are released into gravel substrate into which the female has partially buried herself; 3-7 eggs are laid and the process is repeated; several females may spawn with same male (Winn 1958a; 1958b; Page 1983).
Fecundity: Females produce from less 50 to about 200 eggs per season, generally with multiple clutches (Hubbs 1985); Hubbs et al. (1968) recorded average egg diameter of 1.5 mm. In Kentucky, Small (1975) reported gravid females containing 300-1,200 eggs. Winn (1958b) reported 430-896 ova (of all sizes) in four 1-year-old females (30-33 mm), 938-1,480 ova in four 2-year-olds (36-42 mm), and 1,758-2,070 ova in two 3-year-olds (45-46 mm); eggs averaged 1.2 mm in diameter and hatched in 9.5-10 days at 16.5-18.5 degrees C. Variation in eggs size (mass) has been noted geographically, seasonally, and among females captured at the same place and time (Marsh 1984). In Texas, eggs and larvae survive a temperature range of 10-27 degrees C (Hubbs 1961; Hubbs and Armstrong 1962); those from Missouri and Arkansas survive higher temperature maxima than do those from central Texas (Hubbs and Armstrong 1962).
Age/Size at maturation: Individuals become adults at 1 year of age (Cross 1967; Edwards 1997). Hubbs et al. (1968) observed a ripe female only 27 mm SL.
Phylogeny and morphologically similar fishes: Etheostoma spectabile is similar to the greenthroat darter (E. lepidum) and the mud darter (E. asprigene); the greenthroat darter differs from the orangethroat darter in that it is deepest under middle of 1st dorsal fin, has an interrupted supratemporal canal, and green branchiostegal membranes and breast; the mud darter differs from the orangethroat darter in that it is deepest under middle of 1st dorsal fin, has uninterrupted infraorbital canal, and usually 13-14 pectoral rays (Page and Burr 1991). Artificially induced hybridization between E. spectabile and related E. lepidum produces fertile females but sterile males (Hubbs 1958a). Hubbs and Laritz (1961) reported natural occurrence of E. spectabile X Percina sciera (= Hadropterus scierus, the dusky darter) hybrid.
Commercial or Environmental Importance
[Additional literature noting collection of this species from Texas locations includes, but is not limited to the following: Hubbs and Strawn (1957); Hubbs (1957; 1958b; 1960; 1967); Hubbs and Hettler 1958; Riggs and Bonn (1959); Marsh (1986).]
Freshwater Fish Species of Texas: Etheostoma; Etheostoma spectabile; Orangethroat Darter; Percidae
Etymology/Derivation of Scientific Name
Etheostoma, from the Greek etheo, “to strain,” and stoma, mouth”; histrio Latin, meaning, “a harlequin” (Pflieger 1997).
Synonymy
Etheosoma histrio Jordan and Gilbert in C.H. Gilbert 1887:47 (Type locale: Poteau River Oklahoma; Saline and Washita Rivers, Arkansas).
Etheosoma histrio F.A. Cook 1959:204
Type Locality
Saline River at Benton AR; Washita River at Arkadelphia; and Poteau River, OK, west of Hackett City, AR (Jordan and Gilbert in Gilbert 1887).
Not listed as threatened or endangered by Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (2006). Populations in southern drainages are currently secure (Warren et al. 2000).
Etnier and Starnes (1993) note that they possess a number of mid-May collections containing young-of-year specimens ranging from 14-27 mm TL.
Coloration: The back is brown to olive with six to seven dark brown saddles. The sides have medial blotches that may join with saddles to form 7-11 dark green or brown vertical bars. There are two large darks spots at the base of the caudal fin. There are smaller dark spots at the base of the caudal, pectoral and pelvic fins. The spinous dorsal fin has dark anterior and posterior spots a red marginal band, and a brown submarginal band. The postorbital bars are narrow, but extend onto the underside of the head; the preorbital bars are well developed. Breeding males have more intense colors, including bright green on the sides a wide red marginal band in the spinous dorsal fin, dusky pelvic fins, and turquoise gill membranes (Page 1983; Ross 2001).
Counts: Lateral scales 45-58 (48-55), 0-3 (0) unpored; scales above lateral line 4-8; scales below lateral line 6-9; transverse scales 12-18; scales around caudal peduncle 15-21; dorsal spines 9-11 (10); dorsal rays 11-14 (13); pectoral rays 13-16 (15); anal spines 2; anal rays 6-8 (7; Page 1983).
Body shape: Moderately robust body; blunt snout (Ross 2001). Head angular, profile in front of eye more than 45 degrees. Body depth contained in standard length less than seven times (Hubbs et al. 1991).
Mouth position: Slightly subterminal (Goldstein and Simon 1999).
External morphology: Pectoral fin longer than head, reaching beyond anus. Preopercle smooth or weakly serrate. Upper jaw not extending as far as to middle of eye (Hubbs et al. 1991). Nape fully scaled; belly, cheek, and opercle are unscaled to partly scaled; breast is unscaled. Tubercles do not develop on either sex (Page 1983). Lateral line complete and straight. Females have a tubular genital papilla (Ross 2001).
Maximum size: 64mm SL (Page 1983).
U.S. distribution: Ranges from southern Mississippi Valley into extreme eastern Texas (Hubbs et al. 1991).
Texas distribution: Occurs in small detritus laden tributaries in the Cypress, Sabine, Neches and Trinity Basins (Hubbs et al. 1991).
Invertivore; benthic (Goldstein and Simon 1999). Diet consists mainly of midgefly larvae (chironomids), black fly (simuliids), caddisfly tricopterans, and mayfly (ephemeropterans) larvae (Kuhajda and Warren 1989).
Macrohabitat: Generally in large streams (Ross 2001).
Mesohabitat: In east Texas, Hubbs and Pigg (1972) noted numerous collections of species made over sandy bottom locales in seine hauls set below log piles containing much detritus; occurrence of species in similar habitat recorded (Starnes 1973; Sisk and Webb 1976; Warren 1982). Also collected in the following habitats: sluggish streams over mud bottoms; riffle areas over gravel, sand, or mud substrate; and in swift, turbid water over shaly rocks (Hocutt 1980; Carlander 1997).
Based on Kentucky populations about 4+ years (Kuhajda and Warren 1989).
Etnier and Starnes (1983) stated that apparent considerable seasonal movement occurs, perhaps into big rivers and reservoirs during colder months from smaller tributaries occupied from late spring through fall (Etnier and Starnes 1993). Kuhajda and Warren, who studied the species in western Kentucky, hypothesize that sexually mature individuals migrate to deep water of large streams during the breeding season, where they attach eggs to the components of detritus (Boschung and Mayden 2004).
Spawning season: Hubbs and Pigg (1972) reported ripe females collected in February, from Pedro Creek (Houston Co., TX); additional east Texas spawning recorded for late-March (Hubbs 1985). In Mississippi, spawning reported to begin in mid-March (Kuehne and Barbour 1983). In Kentucky, spawning documented during February and March (Kuhajda and Warren 1989).
Spawning habitat: Guarder; substratum chooser. Phytophil, having adhesive eggs that are attached to a variety of plants; the free embryos without cement glands swim instantly after a prolonged embryonic period (Simon 1994; Simon 1999).
Reproductive strategy: Breeding site is unknown, as species disappears during the breeding season (Kuhajda and Warren 1989; Boschung and Mayden 2004).
Fecundity: Average number of ovarian eggs ranges from 89 to 456 in fish of age classes 2-4, although count may include various developmental stages of ova (Kuhajda and Warren 1989).
Age at maturation: Females are able to spawn in their first year (Kuhajda and Warren 1989).
Phylogeny and morphologically similar fishes: Etheostoma histrio is in the subgenus Etheostoma (Ross 2001). Reviewed by Tsai (1968), who found little geographic variation in this species; recognized no subspecies.
Commercial or Environmental Importance
[Additional literature noting collection of this species from Texas locations includes, but is not limited to the following: Village Creek, a blackwater tributary of the Neches River (Hardin Co.; Moriarty and Winemiller 1997).]
Freshwater Fish Species of Texas: Etheostoma; Etheostoma histrio; Harlequin Darter; Percidae
Image Galleries: Percidae of Texas
Freshwater Fish Species of Texas: Etheostoma; Etheostoma artesiae; Percidae; Redspot Darter
Imaging Technique: Illustration
by Joe Tomelleri, http://www.americanfishes.com/
Image Galleries: Percidae of Texas
Freshwater Fish Species of Texas: Etheostoma; Etheostoma artesiae; Percidae; Redspot Darter
Imaging Technique: Illustration
by Joe Tomelleri, http://www.americanfishes.com/
Image Galleries: Percidae of Texas
Freshwater Fish Species of Texas: Bluntnose Darter; Etheostoma; Etheostoma chlorosoma; Percidae
Imaging Technique: Illustration
Image Galleries: Percidae of Texas
Freshwater Fish Species of Texas: Etheostoma; Etheostoma fonticola; Fountain Darter; Percidae
Imaging Technique: Photograph
Image Galleries: Percidae of Texas
Freshwater Fish Species of Texas: Etheostoma; Etheostoma fonticola; Fountain Darter; Percidae
Imaging Technique: Photograph
by Joe Tomelleri, http://www.americanfishes.com/
Image Galleries: Percidae of Texas
Freshwater Fish Species of Texas: Etheostoma; Etheostoma histrio; Harlequin Darter; Percidae
Imaging Technique: Illustration
by Joe Tomelleri, http://www.americanfishes.com/
Image Galleries: Percidae of Texas
Freshwater Fish Species of Texas: Etheostoma; Etheostoma spectabile; Orangethroat Darter; Percidae
Imaging Technique: Illustration
Image Galleries: Percidae of Texas
Freshwater Fish Species of Texas: Etheostoma; Etheostoma histrio; Harlequin Darter; Percidae
Imaging Technique: Illustration
by Joe Tomelleri, http://www.americanfishes.com/
Image Galleries: Percidae of Texas
Freshwater Fish Species of Texas: Etheostoma; Etheostoma spectabile; Orangethroat Darter; Percidae
Imaging Technique: Illustration
by Joe Tomelleri, http://www.americanfishes.com/
Image Galleries: Percidae of Texas
Freshwater Fish Species of Texas: Etheostoma; Etheostoma spectabile; Orangethroat Darter; Percidae
Imaging Technique: Illustration